Competitive Positioning

Product-native capability comparison for pilot and evaluation conversations. Capability-based — no legal or commercial competitor claims.

Workflow Gap Coverage

Xin fills three workflow gaps that commonly co-exist in China research programs. Each gap is addressed by implemented, testable features.

Workflow type What it provides What it lacks Xin capability that fills the gap
Alert-only Notifications when monitored content changes or matches a keyword No versioned history, no structured extraction, no cite-able output Versioned source monitoring · source-version-level citations · diff history
Structure-only Extracted entities, facts, and relations from source content No review quality gate — all extracted facts pass downstream unvetted Accept/reject review workflow · accepted_only dossier policy · readiness status
Generic investigation Broad research and collection across many domains and languages Not optimized for China source hierarchy, CJK content, or official source trust levels Layered China source registry · multilingual entity model · CJK-capable export

Product Differentiators

Loading differentiators from /admin/demo/eval/packet

Migration Notes — Common Displacement Paths

Lightweight, operator-actionable notes for the three most common displacement scenarios.

Loading migration notes…

Run the China Demo

Bootstrap 8 curated sources, 3 themed watchlists, and 1 demo dossier scaffold.
Walk the full flow: ingest → review → accepted-only dossier → export.

Go to Demo → Download Eval Packet JSON ↗